Author Archives: Mel Baggs

About Mel Baggs

Hufflepuff. Came from the redwoods, which tell me who I am and where I belong in the world. I relate to objects as if they are alive, but as things with identities and properties all of their own, not as something human-like. Culturally I'm from a California Okie background. Crochet or otherwise create constantly, write poetry and paint when I can. Proud member of the developmental disability self-advocacy movement. I care a lot more about being a human being than I care about what categories I fit into.

On the “angry” nature of my writing.

Standard

I’ve never seen it. I mean, sure, I get angry, but I also get a lot of other things, and I don’t run around angry all the time. And quite often I will write something where the predominant motivation is love, for instance, and get told how angry I sound. I have also once read a person say that they could not get through Jim Sinclair’s “Don’t Mourn For Us” because of the tremendous rage towards parents that they felt in it — that is an article in which I can see very little but love. Not that love and anger can’t coexist, but I just don’t see the anger supposedly permeating Jim Sinclair’s work or my work and so forth.

Anyway, I found this interesting lyric the other day by Ani Difranco (who seems to write a lot of interesting lyrics but then sings them in a style I have trouble wanting to listen to, so I can’t really be classified as a fan of the music, but perhaps sometimes a fan of the lyrics). I can’t even remember how I stumbled across it. It goes like this:

I am not an angry girl
But it seems like I’ve got everyone fooled
Every time I say something
They find hard to hear
They chalk it up to my anger
And never to their own fear

I don’t know that it’s always fear that causes that reaction. I’ve often noticed that someone will read something that makes them angry. And then decide that the author of whatever they were reading, was angry. I also know that a lot of people view anything that explicitly contradicts something else as “argumentative” and therefore “angry”. And that a lot of people have a stereotype of activists as perpetually angry.

So fear isn’t the only thing that could cause people to see anger that isn’t there. But it’s one thing. And there does seem a trend in my life of being considered angry when I’m nowhere even close to anger. Of course a lot of people, particularly autistic people, see the actual emotional state that is going on at any given time too. But it’s amazing how many people read what I write and can’t come away from it with anything more than a vision of me as “angry” that seems to make them completely unaware of whatever it is that I’ve actually written and hostile to me as a person instead. (Of course there’s then the whole problem of people taking more from what they perceive as the emotional content of something, than from what was actually meant or said. But that’s a whole ‘nother topic.)

Until the autistics.org thing is sorted out…

Standard

Until the problems autistics.org is having are sorted out (and it’s not a simple issue of scripts — we have scripts and know perfectly well how to use them — but other problems), this is going to be where I stick my blog. Once everything is back to normal, all the entries from here will be moved back to (and appended to) my blog on autistics.org.

You Have It So Good

Standard

[this is a repost from my old blog, since several things link to it at my old blog which isn’t showing much sign of coming back soon, other old blog posts should follow eventually]

You Have It So Good is the latest addition to the Autism Information Library on autistics.org.

I have a lot to say about it. A lot of it is stuff I won’t normally say or stuff I’ve never said all at a time before.

Fortunately in an odd way for me, there’s something stereotypical enough about me that I got services after I moved out of my parents’ home. But due to the fact that I was so isolated at the time, most people, even my family, don’t know a lot about what the time in between moving out and getting services was like. And there was quite a stretch of time in between, in which I honestly believed that I needed to go back to a group home because I’d been brainwashed like everyone else into believing that significant levels of assistance only came from institutions. I just had no clue how to get back to one, which is fortunate.

I rented a room that shared a wall with a bigger house. There was a family of people living there. The little boy — homeschooled, therefore nearly always home — tormented animals, including my cat. His mother’s only response? “I can’t make him care.” (She also held the incompatible belief that he was exquisitely sensitive to all suffering because he’d supposedly screamed about blood when someone was cutting down trees.) The neighbors across the street were often threatening the neighbors next door with death and violence, and I was glad that my little add-on attracted so little attention that even the mailman didn’t always know it was there.

I spent most of my days doing — and able to do — very little. Unless you count banging your head on the wall, because I did a lot of that. My epilepsy was uncontrolled and I once found out I’d been having seizures for twenty minutes. I was in a redwood forest in the mountains of California, and there was mold everywhere. This meant a lot of migraines. And not thinking straight. At all.

Meanwhile the professionals in my life were angry because I’d abandoned them and my parents had allowed me to get away with it. Several predicted death and other dire consequences of living outside their clutches.

Sometimes I was able to drag myself outside, where I sat in my driveway and lined up stones or stacked them on top of each other. Then I went back inside. Sat on the bed. Or the floor. I was disoriented a lot of the time. In a two-room apartment. Couldn’t find the kitchen. Or the bathroom. My perceptions got so mangled that it was often a wonder if I could tell the floor from the walls. I fell down a lot.

I also froze in place more and more, and it became harder and harder to get going. Going to the bathroom, in the bathroom? Not always likely. The floor or the front yard got used just as much, and I often had to sit in it because I couldn’t move enough to take care of it. I sat and didn’t move a lot. And sat and rocked a lot. Screaming, head-banging meltdowns were also common.

Meanwhile my neighbor occasionally came by and tried to scare me with stories that the house was haunted. That "The ones you have to worry about are the ones without bodies." Apparently she and her husband wanted the entire house to themselves but couldn’t afford to rent both their house and my add-on. So they’d gaslighted several previous tenants right out of there. One time while I sat in the front yard, their boy walked up to me and said “I hope you’re not crazy like all the other neighbors.” “Crazy” was what it was called when the previous tenants had believed the stories, which his parents denied telling, at least in front of the landlord. Meanwhile, the neighbor offered me lessons in black magic, which I declined.

Then there was food and water. I couldn’t buy or prepare a basic meal. I set a few things on fire trying to operate the stove. If someone gave me step by step prompting on the telephone, all day, I could get at least some food. But not enough. I got thinner and lying down got uncomfortable because of the way my bones poked into things. This prompting wasn’t just “Pour water in the pot, then turn the stove on.” It often started with moving one limb or digit purposefully. A prompt that had to be repeated over and over for me to be able to do it. Repeat for every step and you can see why it took all day. And this isn’t to mention all the times that I couldn’t understand or obey the prompts and started screaming instead. The phone bills were huge and the person at the other end of the line, autistic and physically disabled herself, was running herself into the ground.

There was a lot I didn’t understand how to do. And even things I understood, I couldn’t do because of the rapid interplay of perception and reaction they required. Getting through the day was exhausting, and getting through the day didn’t even mean fully meeting even one of my basic needs.

At the same time all this was going on, I was dealing with the aftermath, both physical and emotional, of years of intensive “treatment”. I’d been off of neuroleptics for five months when I moved out, and the worst part of the withdrawal was over, but I was still regaining some cognitive abilities. Until I realized it was doing me more harm than good, I was still on the super-restricted diet that I’d been pressured into accepting. And to say I had flashbacks of institutions would have implied I’d grasped yet that I was not living in one anymore. Which I hadn’t. I’d barely started making any chinks in the idea that thinking for myself wouldn’t kill me.

And I had a bunch of untreated infections and serious health problems because as usual I couldn’t communicate adequately to describe what was happening to my body.

If this sounds like a disaster, that’s because it was. But it was also a time period when I was discovering how to communicate with other people — how to attach words to the things inside my head in order to bring them outside my head — by typing. I was discovering, odd as it sounds, that I was a worthwhile person who had a place in the world. I was starting to see disability in a political context rather than the tragic, individual, and medical contexts I’d seen it in before. I had to fight every step of the way for this: Every piece of training I had said I was not supposed to think these things. Online, I read parents doing the same things to their children that had been done to me. I cried. A lot.

The computer was the only physical place I felt all that competent. I was learning about communication, and things were finally snapping into place there that had either never snapped into place that way before or been lost a long time ago in one of the so-called regressions. I started writing to pass the time. I wrote about things I was barely beginning to see: That people like me had some value in the world, weren’t just useless throwaways who belonged either locked up somewhere or cured, a lot of the same stuff I write today. I prayed a lot and wrote what I could perceive spiritually before my training could shut off expression.

The reactions to my writing were often horrifying. Today, I am surprised I was able to keep writing. Sometimes, of course, I wasn’t. But often I was. My daily experience became one where I could barely move in most voluntary ways without tremendous amounts of assistance, I was peeing on the floor, unable to eat, unable to speak, unable to get up and get a glass of water for myself, half-starved, barely able to understand my surroundings, “wandering” aimlessly outside, sleeping on a completely random schedule, looking so “non-functional” by ordinary standards that if the wrong person had seen me I’d have been in an institution fast for sheer inability to take care of myself. The local teens, if they saw me, found ways of “messing with” the “retard”. And then I would do the only thing I could do well in an outwardly-visible way — write — and get dismissed. Wholesale. Often viciously. As too “capable” to understand “real” autism.

I was not able, at the time, to write fully about what I perceived then. I tried, but I only got parts, and the parts I got probably confused people. What I perceived was a glaring contrast, so glaring that it was stunning. The contrast was between what the majority of online parents and even many online autistics thought of my life, and what my life actually was. It had been so ingrained into many that political opinions like mine are formed in good times, not in times of extreme hardship, that they had, pardon the language, no fucking clue what kind of person they were looking at and what kind of life I was living. And I wasn’t all that well-equipped to tell them because the communication skills I was developing were still uneven and it took a long time to get from knowledge to fingers, still often does. (That’s why you’re hearing this now instead of six years ago.)

People who had no knowledge of me in person were calling me a liar. They said I wasn’t really autistic. They said that if I really were autistic, I did not really live the kind of life I led. They said that I did not look like I did. They even told me that I could speak, that I had a job, that I had never lived in an institution, that I did not bang my head, that I had never had any of the “therapies” I was criticizing, that I could “take care of myself”. I was often torn between laughter and tears wondering how they would react if they saw me in person, a person who looked and acted like I could have been used as a poster child for the “keep institutions for developmentally disabled people open” movement, one of those supposedly-ridiculous examples of “Would you put someone this low-functioning in a house by herself???” I suppose I also could’ve been used as a poster child for the “cure autism” movement, considering that parents described my daily life or many things much tamer than that when they described futures they were trying to prevent by curing their children.

That was the contrast I lived, and to a large extent still live, although I now have enough services that I can do more than I could before. (Any break in these services and I go back to being able to either understand my surroundings or move but not both and often neither.) That is in fact the contrast many autistic people live. But few experience that contrast more than those of us who find that not only our writing skills, but what we write about, contradicts every stereotype of the sort of person we are in the offline world. Anyone who says “Autism is horrible because this is what my offline life is like, and you people just don’t understand how much misery autism causes me, you must be a bunch of high-functioning aspies if you’re autistic at all” is much more likely to be believed than those of us who may live a near-identical kind of life and continue to assert our right to be who we are. (Not to mention that the diagnosis of Asperger’s syndrome doesn’t mean a person couldn’t live this kind of life.) And many such people will turn around and tell us we’re liars just as fast as cure-oriented parents will, because it’s in their perceived interests to associate “(perceived) level of impairment” with “level of hatred of autism” and “level of acceptance of the status quo”.

I was, in a way, lucky that it was only one area that stood out in contrast to the rest. I can’t drive, work, pass for NT, or speak, and people know there’s something really weird about me when they meet me. That means that when I applied for services, although I have many times encountered resistance and misunderstanding, I qualified almost immediately. I got SSI on my first try. Same for in-home support services and Regional Center services. When I got that last one, I had to fend off people trying to institutionalize me in a level three group home, I now am told I would qualify for an ICF/MR if I didn’t have in-home services. While there’s occasionally question about why I do, and what kind of services I need, there’s very little question that I appear “non-functional” enough to get services. That doesn’t sound like a good thing but in some contexts it’s saved my life.

Note: I as always reject the terms low-functioning and high-functioning, and this isn’t an invitation to call me low-functioning. But many people would and have. That my insight or writing skills (some of the time, on both of those) don’t match the stereotype says more about the stereotype than it does about me or anyone else who’s ever had that label. When parents say their non-speaking children can’t possibly understand something, my main response is “Maybe not, but how do you know?” It’s been my experience that my level of understanding of my surroundings, of the world in general, of myself, or of anything else, is routinely under- or over-estimated even by those closest to me.

Joel Smith doesn’t often pass for NT, but he can drive, work, and sometimes speak. And he’s a self-advocate, no-cure, disability rights sort of person when he writes, not a woe-is-me my-life-is-hell-I’m-the-lowest-functioning-person-on-the-planet we-need-a-cure-for-autism type. All of that works against him in the stereotypes of many. This kind of stereotyping has got to stop. It may not sound like sophisticated disability theory, but these are people’s lives we’re talking about. He’s not the only one. The prevailing view of how abilities fit together, as well as of how abilities are connected to political views, has to change. Or people will die, and in fact I am certain that many people are already dead over exactly this kind of thing.

People need to stop spreading these stereotypes. That includes autistic people who think that by questioning our diagnostic credibility because of our political views, they will come out ahead services-wise. We’re all in this survival thing together and it’s not okay to sacrifice others that way.

I’m reminded of a post from way back in the depths of time, and apologies for digging this up but it describes the situation so well in the words of one of the most well-known anti-cure autistic self-advocates out there:

You know where this is leading to? I’m going to die here. Maybe soon, if this throat infection overwhelms what’s left of my immune system and turns into pneumonia. Maybe a little later, if I can’t shop or forget to eat for a few days too long. Maybe alone at home, if I have another bizarre accident that’s more serious than the ones I’ve had so far; or maybe on the streets, if my “weird” appearance attracts more violence of the sort I’ve been a target of all my life. Don’t think that just because I’m not mentally retarded, I’m any less affected by autism than your brother is.

That’s from a really old Usenet post by Jim Sinclair that can be found by clicking here. I can only imagine that xe must have been in a similar situation to the one that too many of us have experienced — that contrast again. I don’t agree with some of the statements made, particularly the assumptions about IQ, but I can imagine too well the situation that prompted that post.

It is also this situation that Laura Tisoncik wrote about in Why I Am Angry, saying:

I hate the parent-professional axis that rips people to shreds then drops them into oblivion when they hit adulthood. I hate anything and everything that pays lip service to autism services but with with all its resources couldn’t do what I could do with next to nothing. I hate autism societies that have no use or place for autistics except as an occasional token to perform as freak shows at conferences. I hate “child centered” organizations that leave adult children to eat coffee grounds when there are no more parents to serve. I hate a system that mourns for t
he purgatory of the parent but doesn’t even give a damn about the hell of the autistic.

If anyone wonders, I’m the “19-year-old friend” in that article and she’s the one who ran herself into the ground making sure I could survive while she was barely getting by herself. Anyone who thinks being autistic means lacking compassion doesn’t know her.

Sometimes, while barely (if at all) able to perceive my surroundings, move, perceive the passage of time, react, or some combination of those things, I laugh in my head at the contrast between my life and the way people online pretend to themselves that my life goes. It seems bizarre — and I can have a downright twisted sense of humor — that so many people think they know what my life is or has been like. Sometimes, though, I scream or cry, because I know what the cost of their misperceptions is to people like me, and it’s not a price I want me or anyone else to have to pay. Too many of us pay some or all of it every day.

It has to stop. One ability is not another ability, no matter how closely related (or identical) they seem in abstract stereotype-land. Period. The appearance of an ability does not mean the ability is there. Period. One ability some of the time is not one ability all of the time. Period. Political views on curation, institutions, or anything else like that, do not indicate kind or level of ability in any particular area. Period. All of those are true when inverted, too, appearance of obliviousness doesn’t mean obliviousness for example. Those of us who know this will not shut up about it, and people who don’t had better learn what’s at stake when they trivialize what is happening to us.

Leslie Burke Loses Legal Appeal for Food and Water While Dying

Standard

As this link says, it was just ruled in Britain that a man can’t make a future decision on his own behalf to stay fed and hydrated after he loses all capacity for voluntary movement.

Outside the courtroom, Burke told the Yorkshire Post: “A doctor is not allowed to refuse me food and water while I remain competent.”

“But what is the definition of competent? When do I become an incompetent person? Is it when I am no longer able to communicate?”

“For those people who feel like I do there was no good news at all today,” he said.

This kind of decision is not new or unique. In the United States, there are many states that have “futile care” policies that can override the wishes of patients or their appointed decisionmakers. And people die on the basis of these policies every day. This trend is not just “no good news at all…” it’s terrifying on a scale that few people comprehend.

Put bluntly: Every time I have to go to the hospital, for anything, no matter how routine, I end up having to fear for my life. This fear cannot be explained away as anything other than a reaction to systemic and life-threatening prejudice. I’m scared because I can’t speak communicatively and hospitals have been known to remove or deny the importance of my communication equipment. I’m scared because one of my vocal tics, regardless of mood, is “Kill me!” I’m scared because I don’t always have voluntary movement and have sometimes been presumed dead by emergency responders. I’m scared because I’ve experienced attempted murder in a place that called itself a hospital. I’m scared because my decisionmakers, while clearly defined as having power of attorney, aren’t always going to be listened to.

I have as much legal preparation for my wish to remain alive as is possible. My Protective Medical Decisions Document was carefully crafted according to California law and is valid anywhere in the country. I have durable power of attorney forms that name staunchly anti-euthanasia people including one who’s been involved with Not Dead Yet. But if doctors are legally allowed to assume they know what the quality of my life is or should be before they get to kill me, then no amount of protection will stop them. And if my ability to communicate with them is compromised, they may one day be allowed to make decisions against my wishes which are all well laid out in writing and communicated into the future. Communication into the future doesn’t appear to count for the British court system.

I’ve lived without being able to communicate in a way that other people could understand. I’ve lived without being able to move. I’ve lived without being able to understand or interact with much of my surroundings. I’ve lived as a devalued kind of person while other people, who would not in any way have been punished for it and who appeared to believe I was mainly using up resources that could have been given to others, tried to kill me. Three guesses which one scares me the most.

Endangered…?

Standard

Some geneticists are busy looking at parts of chromosomes 7 and 21 for a connection to so-called regressive autism. I’m still dubious about it being that simple, given that there are many possible causes for the things being dubbed ‘regression’. But if these are truly the main genes involved in this expression, then they’re probably talking about me: I lost prior speech abilities in early childhood and have lost a number of other abilities (including the speech I’d regained) later in life.

Meanwhile, the push is getting greater to detect autistic people before we’re born, so that we don’t have to be born. Eugenic abortion — as one person put it not the right to choose whether, but the right to choose who — is already so commonplace towards people with Down’s syndrome that one activist with Down’s syndrome, Astra Milberg, has commented that she feels like one of an endangered species, and several activists with Down’s syndrome protested at an international genetic screening conference for their right to speak out against this a few years ago.

I wish I could say I felt much of anything, but I’m more sort of numb. I know exactly where things are headed, and I will work as hard as I can to stop them just as I have been all along for people who already peg some people’s “don’t even get a chance at life” meters, but I guess I got the strong freaked-out emotions out of the way when I saw where this was going years ago. It’s just… weird… to know they’re getting this close to identifying the genes, and that they’re zeroing in on subtypes that sound suspiciously like mine.

Echostaffia and Power

Standard

“We were talking about the way people were saying things in such a vague way, and he was telling me how someone had just told him about my asking ‘What exactly do you mean by that?’ when someone asked me something in vague and confusing terms. And… he laughed.” I was trying to explain it to my friend.

“That’s just about as funny as someone with an intellectual disability getting confused over four-syllable words is funny!” was her response.

“The worst part, though… was that I laughed too. I didn’t want to laugh. I didn’t mean to laugh. It was just…”

“Echolaughia?”

“No, it wasn’t just laughing because he was laughing. I was laughing because I was afraid not to. When I laugh around you, I feel like I’m really laughing. When I laugh around them, it’s self-defense.”

“Oh… echostaffia.”

Echostaffia is a good word for Cute Client Mode. The cure for echostaffia, my friend said, is genuine power.

Earlier today, I was reading a paper by Wolf Wolfensberger on something he calls Social Role Valorization, and how it’s in opposition to things like empowerment and self-determination. He says that it should be. That the power involved in the ideas of self-determination and empowerment is just a shallow sort of power anyway, and is power over other people, and all sorts of other excuses as to why his theory was more suitable than these other ones.

He said that there are large groups of people all over the world who are utterly powerless and utterly happy. My friend’s comment, when I was ranting about the sort of disempowerment I’d love to subject Wolfensberger to, was “Oh… there are lots of people who’ve learned echostaffia, that I’ll believe!”

I am not the sort of person who calculatedly constructs different images to show to different people. I couldn’t keep up with it. I have been told that I am remarkably consistent in my personality across all situations, whereas most people change a good deal depending on who they’re around. But there are still lines I won’t cross. And the vast majority of staff will never see some important aspects of me.

When I am around staff, I do certain things in order to survive. When I am around friends, I don’t have to do those things. Hell, when I’m around strangers, I don’t have to do as many of those things.

I learned to hide my feelings, especially negative ones. The very first day in the state hospital, I received a valuable piece of advice. Feeling frightened, abandoned, and alone, I started to cry in the day room. Another patient came and sat beside me, leaned over and whispered, “Don’t do that. They’ll think you’re depressed.” So I learned to cry only at night, in my bed, under the covers without making a sound.

My only aim during my two-month stay in the state hospital (probably the longest two months of my life) was to get out. If that meant being a good patient, if that meant playing the game, telling them what they wanted to hear, then so be it. At the same time, I was consumed with the clear conviction that there was something fundamentally wrong here. Who were these people that had taken such total control of our lives? Why were they the experts on what we should do, how we should live? Why was the ugliness, and even the brutality, of what was happening to us overlooked and ignored? Why had the world turned its back on us?

So I became a good patient outwardly, while inside I nurtured a secret rebellion that was no less real for being hidden. I used to imagine a future in which an army of former patients marched on the hospital, emptied it of patients and staff, and then burned all the buildings to the ground. In my fantasy, we joined hands and danced around this bonfire of oppression. You see, in my heart I was already a very, very bad patient!

-Judi Chamberlin, Confessions of a Non-Compliant Patient

News flash to the vast majority of staff: That ‘contented client’ of yours may be plotting revolution in her head. When we are going along with what you say, it can be more about our legitimate fear of you than the inherent wisdom and rightness of your ideas. When we laugh with you while you laugh at us, it may be because we’re afraid of what will happen if we don’t. You can build entire relationships that you consider deep and meaningful, and the relationship is actually with the actions we use to defend ourselves against you. Some of you call that connection, I call it disgusting.

You may talk about trust. But in a system that routinely harms us, trust has to be earned. You don’t earn trust by talking about how wonderful you are. You earn trust by demonstrating that you’re trustworthy. Doing, not saying. And demanding that trust, demanding that we “open up” to you or whatever your jargon tells you we must do in order to “establish a relationship” with you… that’s the surest route to never being trusted. Most of us have been hearing this our whole lives, after awhile we stop buying it.

The paper on Social Role Valorization says that being ‘protected’ is more important than having power. It talks about people who were ‘dumped’ from institutions, who ‘fiercely defend’ the power they have, while leading ‘miserable’ lives in worse material circumstances than institutions. Instead of actually learning that there are more important things than the pseudo-protection that institutions claim to offer… the author goes on to dismiss such people as essentially defective, stupid, crazy, short-sighted, and so forth. (Not to mention invoking in people’s minds the old false dichotomy of abuse vs. neglect, confinement vs. abandonment.)

One of the reasons I believe I was able to escape the role of chronic patient that had been predicted for me was that I was able to leave the surveillance and control of the mental health system when I left the state hospital. Today, that’s called “falling through the cracks.” While I agree that it’s important to help people avoid hunger and homelessness, such help must not come at too high a price. Help that comes with unwanted strings – “We’ll give you housing if you take medication,” “We’ll sign your SSI papers if you go to the day program” -is help that is paid for in imprisoned spirits and stifled dreams. We should not be surprised that some people won’t sell their souls so cheaply.

-Judi Chamberlin, Confessions of a Non-Compliant Patient

Power, real power, not whatever false-ego-power-crap Wolfensberger was reducing empowerment to, is important. It means that echostaffia and Cute Client Mode, and the pretty lies that staff construct around them, don’t have to exist. If things were really so wonderful off in staff-land, we wouldn’t have to use that mode to appease staff. And we wouldn’t be taught that this is all our problem, that if we were just more trusting or whatever, they’d be more trustworthy or whatever (or that there’s something wrong with our attitude and outlook, or…).

I hope one day to have enough power that I will not have to deal with the confusion that comes after even a brief lapse into Cute Client Mode. The difference between spending time with a friend, and spending time with staff, is striking. Also the difference between spending time with staff, and spending time afterwards alone to deal with the aftermath of all this. I can’t describe it. I just know how disgusting it is.

All those “unmotivated clients” I keep hearing about are the ones who are on a silent sit-down strike about others’ visions of what their lives should be like. When I ask professionals what it is that their clients are “unmotivated ” about, it usually turns out to be washing floors or dishes, on the one hand, or going to meaningless meetings on the other. Would you be “motivated” to reveal your deepest secrets to a stranger, for example, someone you have no reason to believe you can trust with this sensitive information? And, more important, should you be “motivated” to do so?

-Judi Chamberlin, Confessions of a Non-Compliant Patient

I would rather have power — not tons of it, just what’s necessary — than have some staff running around trying to save me from a non-valorized social role, any day. And I’d rather have power than have to deal with my entire personality being temporarily tweaked by random encounters with staff who don’t even notice when it’s happening because they already have so much power.

Wandering

Standard

When non-autistic people walk out of their homes, they are “taking a walk” or “walking somewhere” or something like that.

When autistic people walk out of our homes, we are… wandering!

I don’t know what it is that gives people that impression. But I have been accused of wandering when:

  • Taking a walk.
  • Waiting outside rather than inside for staff to show up.
  • Trying to take a bus.
  • Running away from a fight that broke out at a day program.
  • Leaving the room to avoid reacting physically in anger.
  • Trying to escape institutions.
  • Going on long walks to explore the geography of an area.

The assumption in all of these cases and many more is that we are just kind of moving around without any point to it. I suppose this should not be surprising, since most of what we do is described as purposeless and pointless.

If I were to walk out the door right now — walking, without any mobility aids to make people afraid to look at me or whatever it is they do — I bet someone would call the police in a matter of minutes or hours, to report a “wandering” person in their neighborhood. (Possibly more adjectives would be added, such as disoriented and unresponsive to being shouted at. I have also been described by one neurologist as having some sort of unspecified but severe ‘psychiatric issues’ for, after many years of this being the case, fearing it enough to get a Medic-Alert bracelet — something I did on the advice of a disability professional, mind you.)

But it gets even more interesting. I do sometimes do things involuntarily, without knowing why I do them (I assume there is still a neurological purpose to them), and sometimes while very confused. It is at these times — times when the whole concept of attention is often lost on me or the last thing I want — that I am often referred to as engaging in deliberate, “attention-seeking” behavior. And I have seen this same concept applied to other autistics doing the same thing.

Why our behavior is presumed to be the result of purposeless confusion, while behavior toward an identical goal by others is not, is still a mystery to me. As is why, when our behavior does involve some amount of involuntariness or confusion… suddenly we’re “fully aware of our actions and just using them to manipulate people or get out of doing something”.

Not all those who ‘wander’ are lost. Or even wandering.

You Come Into My Home…

Standard

It seems like it’s some variation on the same thing every time.

You come into my home.

You have some set of values that you’ve learned through a seminar or wherever else professionals go to learn these things. They go by a lot of names, most of them buzzwords: Self-determination, client empowerment, etc. You also have a bunch of values around the right way and the wrong way to relate to people.

You come into my home, and you press these values on me. Sometimes gently, sometimes admonishingly, sometimes forcefully. You rarely wait to be asked for advice, or reflect on whether I want or need your advice. You just do it.

If I resist in some way, you invoke reciprocity, equality, respect, and other things like that. It doesn’t seem to occur to you that putting a nice veneer over things doesn’t mean you’re doing the right thing. Or that I might do things the way I do them for a reason. Or that in bringing your values into my home and insisting that I follow them in a relationship I’d rather not have with you, you are doing the opposite of things like self-determination or empowerment.

You don’t think about this. You assume that you are benevolent, and therefore that my resistance is not benevolent. If I am going along with you, it is because you are right, not because I am afraid of you. You act utterly unaware of the power differences between us, often because this upsets your notion of equality.

Most disabled people are not going to talk or act in the ways that you have been taught are the only respectful ways to talk or act. Because most people are not going to talk or act this way. But around you, we’re not allowed to be regular people.

We have to be a mirror image of your values, because to you that is equality. You don’t acknowledge this at all. You have all these wonderful bright shiny ideas whose original intent was to be respectful to us. But even when those ideas are correct, you act as if they are contingent on our acting the same way towards you. Whether or not we’re capable of it. Whether or not our own value systems agree with it. No matter how much harm it causes us to go along with it.

If we don’t act that way, you think we need it… explained. Or you think you’re justified in withdrawing any respect you showed to us. Respect for the right of disabled people to determine our own lives isn’t contingent on us getting to know you, on us talking a certain way to you, on us following a certain way to act, on us even liking you. But it’s so much easier, since you have the power to do it, to withdraw respect for us whenever you think we don’t respect you.

In the middle of this, I try to speak up, but it’s hard because of all the soft wonderful words you wrap everything in. You make the unreasonable sound reasonable, the inhumane sound humane. And often you actually believe it. “In the language of Orthanc, help means ruin and saving means slaying, that is plain.”

Then… someone walks in who actually knows me. It only takes a second to see what has happened. They say so. It breaks the spell of silence and softness. But then they are blamed. For getting me agitated. For “speaking for me”. For being judgmental. For not being soft and mild and sweeping things under the rug. For not using “I-statements”.

You sum the whole thing up with “Things were doing just great before you came in…” What this means is that when you were speaking for me without realizing it, things were fine. When someone else is interpreting my behavior into English, then something’s wrong. Even if they’re more right than you are. You’ve built up an imaginary world where I am relating to you in your ideal way because I want to, rather than because I know that relating to you in any other way could be dangerous, especially without witnesses.

This has happened more than once. It happens over and over again. It happens to more people than me. But if you — the people who do this to disabled people — read this, I doubt you’d think it applied to you. You would probably either focus on me for “misinterpreting” things or being ungrateful for your wonderful attitudes, or skip over that and believe I must be describing some other encounter with some other staff. It couldn’t possibly be you. Because you mean well.

And the scary thing is that if you read this, you might end up applying it in some other way that disempowers disabled people. Just as you have used the word self-determination to undermine my self-determination, the word empowerment to make sure that I am disempowered, the word independence to ensure that I am dependent on the people you prefer. Unless you understand the underlying facts of these situations, in terms of power, in terms of ability, in terms of a lot of things, you can toss around words all you want and all you’ll get is the same scenario. Over, and over, and over again.

David Rovics wrote a song once. He said, “If you find this song offensive, it’s probably about you.” I am sure that many people who have done this to me would find this highly offensive, disrespectful, and a number of other things. After all, I’m not being grateful, I’m not following a set of values I never agreed to in the first place, I’m (in their eyes) contradicting the things I said and did while too terrified to do anything else (which they will see as dishonest), I’m not giving them the chance to prove that they are different and they are the one that’s not doing this. (Hint: Don’t tell me and demand gratitude and obedience. Show me. If you aren’t doing this, I’ll find out, and I won’t need to be told. If you tell me, and then want something out of me based on your saying you’re not this kind of person, then you almost certainly are this kind of person.) And I’m certainly not couching this in terms of my feelings, because it’s not about that.

It’s about power, and who has it, and who doesn’t, and who maintains it while thinking or acting like they’re not. And who sits there going along with more than they want to in meetings because they’re legitimately afraid and things are moving too fast and language is confusing and so forth. But who can type out later exactly what’s going on.

Scientology’s War on Psychiatry

Standard

A recent article on $cientology and psychiatry on Salon.com. And it’s worrisome.

I have no doubt that $cientology is a dangerous cult that only fights psychiatry because they view psychiatry as competition. But having to choose, as the article depicts things, between $cientology and NAMI? That’s like choosing whether to be executed by slow freezing or slow cooking.

Interestingly, the article also mentions the efforts of Narconon, a scientology front group, to promote its pseudoscientific ideas in drug education classes for children. The article does not say that drug education is bad. It says that scientology’s approach to it is bad. Yet when scientology criticizes psychiatry, the impression you get from the article is that all such criticism is the dangerous ravings of cultists.

Take the fact that schizophrenia is represented by scientologists as not just one thing. The article says that this flies in the face of textbooks everywhere. But actually, it doesn’t. Many abnormal psychology textbooks refer to schizophrenia as “the schizophrenias” and make a point of them being more than one thing. I would go further and say that they’re not even all related things, except in the mind of Bleuler, and that this explains why things keep getting moved out of that category with changing opinion in the field. But the article presents this kind of criticism as cultic blather.

It’s a difficult position to be in, because the antipsychiatry movement has never truly been antipsychiatry. It has at various times been overrun by the professional interests of psychoanalytic psychiatrists and scientologists. The rest of us — the ones directly harmed by psychiatry — are obscured by the fame of people like L. Ron Hubbard, R. D. Laing, or Peter Breggin. Those of us who speak out against $cientology as well as psychiatry are not even noticed. I’ve even been urged by a non-$cientologist psych survivor to shut up about $cientology because they’re “our allies” in this. They’re not my allies, nor the allies of a lot of people I know.

But… of course, having been in the system, people like me are just too stupid or crazy to know what we’re talking about. Or we’ve been duped by $cientology, just like disabled people who’ve criticized the ableist aspects of euthanasia have been considered to be duped by the religious right. It couldn’t possibly be — in a lot of people’s minds — that we actually have something legitimate to say. And articles like the Salon article make it that much harder for our voices to be heard over the clash between two equally monstrous institutions.

Retirement community sued for refusing to allow hiring of personal attendants

Standard

Retirement community sued for refusing to allow hiring of personal attendants.

This lawsuit has a lot to do with the notions I talked about in my last post, about other people’s notions of what disabled people need at any given time. In particular, about the notion that people who need a certain kind or level of assistance belong in a certain kind of building.

In the developmental and psych systems, the hierarchy of kinds of buildings — regardless of what’s actually provided in each — tends to run from large state institutions, to private institutions, to ICF/MRs and group homes and halfway houses, to “supported apartments” and “mental health housing”, to assistance in one’s own apartment. Physically disabled and old people deal more with the threat of nursing homes in particular, although people with CP are often put in the developmental system.

In this case, the woman hires and receives assistance from attendants in her own apartment. The managers of her apartment complex are convinced that this level of support is only possible in a nursing home, despite the evidence in front of them that she is getting exactly this level of support outside of a nursing home.

This is also what happens when people say, “My daughter could never live in her own apartment, she needs a group home.” Or, “My son is in the most restrictive environment possible and I aim to keep him there.” (I heard that last one word for word at a conference on inclusion for DD people. The woman went on to describe a son whose behavior — and reactions to confinement — strongly resembled mine at his age.) People really do believe that the size and shape of a building dictates the amount of assistance people can receive, and that they have the right to decide for us what size and shape of building we should live in.

And that prejudice, as usual, shapes policy, and that needs to change.