Comments on: We need to remove this access barrier before it gets put up. (Incandescent lighting ban in California.) https://ballastexistenz.wordpress.com/2007/01/31/we-need-to-remove-this-access-barrier-before-it-gets-put-up-incandescent-lighting-ban-in-california/ Sun, 24 Aug 2008 22:25:12 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: pynchonfangirl https://ballastexistenz.wordpress.com/2007/01/31/we-need-to-remove-this-access-barrier-before-it-gets-put-up-incandescent-lighting-ban-in-california/#comment-15570 Sun, 24 Aug 2008 22:25:12 +0000 http://ballastexistenz.autistics.org/?p=301#comment-15570 I have no problems with fluorescent or LED lights, but I do have photic sneeze reflex. I think it would be less hot and sneeze-inducing in the outer Atlanta suburbs if the developers left more trees around.

]]>
By: Elizabeth https://ballastexistenz.wordpress.com/2007/01/31/we-need-to-remove-this-access-barrier-before-it-gets-put-up-incandescent-lighting-ban-in-california/#comment-15569 Thu, 21 Aug 2008 20:43:51 +0000 http://ballastexistenz.autistics.org/?p=301#comment-15569 In NJ, two new to the position are hoping to win Congressional seats against the incumbants. The President has no real power in this issue and basically is a scapegoat for whatever happens, good or bad. Both candidates are willing to review whatever documented evidence you might email/fax/mail their staff. One in a former life was a scientist and is impressed by a presentation in accordance with the Scientific Method approach, which should impress the other man, too. This means hypothesis — “CDLs are a poor solution for a segment of the US population, people and lives being sacrificed in the interests of living Green.” data — {list scientific and medical bibliographies that can be checked by their respective staffs and provide a one or two sentence summary on each posting, if possible.}. conclusion — ask the non-incumbent if the price for being Green is too high when weaker segments physically of the population are sacrificed for political expendiency and policy (This is a moral question as to what is best for all US Citizens and real freedoms defined in the US Constitution that define the USA, not a Party question.). The incumbents probably have done nothing on this issue, but Congressional voting records, public record through the Freedom of Information Act, would need to be checked before arriving at such a conclusion.

People living in other States than NJ should especially contact their non-incumbent Congressional candidates as well as attend public meetings of these candidates scheduled. In NJ the postings tend to be on the County webpages of the respective Parties. Be in attendance and ask the question with others, if possible, asking in a group. Prior to this, send them the data and bring it again, with possibly more additions and/or signed petitions. Maybe the physical damage to the smaller population from the CDLs can be minimized through preventative means. And, if the issue does not specifically target you, it may a loved one now or in the future and possibly substantial mercury, say from vents, and/or high frequency exposure over time can adversely affect you. The scientific and medical journals with the evidence lack the same financing, far less, as the proponents of the Green movement and cannot get the word out. In fact, many people are ignorant of the issue altogether.

]]>
By: Eugene https://ballastexistenz.wordpress.com/2007/01/31/we-need-to-remove-this-access-barrier-before-it-gets-put-up-incandescent-lighting-ban-in-california/#comment-15568 Mon, 31 Mar 2008 23:42:22 +0000 http://ballastexistenz.autistics.org/?p=301#comment-15568 I should read comments from Javik and Jace first. Seems similar. I never thought this is related to autism.

]]>
By: Eugene https://ballastexistenz.wordpress.com/2007/01/31/we-need-to-remove-this-access-barrier-before-it-gets-put-up-incandescent-lighting-ban-in-california/#comment-15567 Mon, 31 Mar 2008 23:33:48 +0000 http://ballastexistenz.autistics.org/?p=301#comment-15567 I want to go a little off-topic: monitors. What do you folks think about CRT vs. LCD? Which is better for you?

I’m AS and I’m not sensitive to fluorescent lamps, but I find CRT very disturbing if it goes at 60 Hz (usually due to misconfiguration). 85 Hz and more is OK for me, and 75 is acceptable. Being an IT person and seeing a lot of monitors and people behind them, I always wondered how people can work with a CRT monitor at 60 Hz and sometimes they even don’t notice it. After reading the post, I see this probably is natural for some people to be more sensitive to this, and for others to be less sensitive.

But I suspect that those who don’t notice, still can grow tired because of using such monitors. So I’m glad LCD’s are gradually replacing CRT, thus eliminating the problem.

But are there some problems with LCD? This is what I want to ask.

]]>
By: Henry Emrich https://ballastexistenz.wordpress.com/2007/01/31/we-need-to-remove-this-access-barrier-before-it-gets-put-up-incandescent-lighting-ban-in-california/#comment-15566 Tue, 18 Mar 2008 21:20:10 +0000 http://ballastexistenz.autistics.org/?p=301#comment-15566 Anybody else here have “light-sensitive migraines?” As you all know, I’m not Autistic (at least not so as I’ve been diagnosed, although the way you guys phrase things and evidently view the world makes a hell of a lot of sense fo me, on some level….)

But anyway, my primary thing is that I’m 20/200 nearsighted. Evidently also have “light-sensitive migraines”, in that certain lighting conditions freak me out physiologically, to where I damn near go blind (my vision basically whites out, except that it’s shot through with colors, and there’s this weird sound in my head that I can’t even describe….) Seems to only happen under very specific conditions: namely, I’m perfectly fine unless flourescent tube-type lights are both failing in a very specific way: they both have to be flickering much more than usual AND the “beat frequency” interval between the pulses has to be fairly specific, but if this happens (not very often, but several times now), I’m pretty much fucked for the rest of the day. I get this weird burning sensation inside of my head, behind my eye sockets…..very nasty.

I think the best think to do would be for people to go to california and pelt the legislators with light bulbs and rotten fruit. Politics pisses me off, and needs to be destroyed.

]]>
By: A.J. Luxton https://ballastexistenz.wordpress.com/2007/01/31/we-need-to-remove-this-access-barrier-before-it-gets-put-up-incandescent-lighting-ban-in-california/#comment-15565 Tue, 13 Nov 2007 14:35:39 +0000 http://ballastexistenz.autistics.org/?p=301#comment-15565 You don’t need to be living in California to say something about it — Hillary Clinton just made a campaign promise to phase out incandescents.

Everyone should write to her people.

]]>
By: Ophelia Austin-Small https://ballastexistenz.wordpress.com/2007/01/31/we-need-to-remove-this-access-barrier-before-it-gets-put-up-incandescent-lighting-ban-in-california/#comment-15564 Mon, 12 Nov 2007 06:51:33 +0000 http://ballastexistenz.autistics.org/?p=301#comment-15564 I have several physical conditions that get aggravated by flourescent (as well as certain other types) of lighting. My retina detached a few years back, and I have permanent damage to my left eye. F. lighting can cause excessive strain on my eyes, causing pain, headaches, visual problems, and in the long-term, potential vision loss. I also have multiple sclerosis. When I am having a relapse, I get an MS-related eye pain that is markedly worse with F. lighting. My retina specialist is very much against me having it around at all. If it becomes mandatory, I will be sad. Very very sad. And wear sunglasses a lot. And look like a total tool.

]]>
By: Andrea https://ballastexistenz.wordpress.com/2007/01/31/we-need-to-remove-this-access-barrier-before-it-gets-put-up-incandescent-lighting-ban-in-california/#comment-15563 Tue, 06 Nov 2007 17:06:18 +0000 http://ballastexistenz.autistics.org/?p=301#comment-15563 pd: This sounds like just the kind of information that should go into a letter to legislators. It would just be a matter of adding the appropriate introductory paragraph with your demand (If a similar mandatory flourescent light is being actively considered in your locale, this could be something like, “Please vote NO on [insert number of bill here] [insert name of flourescentlighting bill here]; if they haven’t started debating it yet, this could be something like “In some states they have been considering making flourescent lighting mandatory; if this ever comes up for consideration here, please vote NO.”] Then a line saying, For many people with certain lighting sensitivities, flourescent lighting has been verifiably damaging to our health. A mandatory flourescent lighting law would severely hamper our ability to carry out our daily routines and responsibilities” or whatever. Then, basically everything you say here, except maybe condensed a little (because shorter letters tend to carry more impact because they’re more likely to be read).

I hope you consider it.

]]>
By: pd https://ballastexistenz.wordpress.com/2007/01/31/we-need-to-remove-this-access-barrier-before-it-gets-put-up-incandescent-lighting-ban-in-california/#comment-15562 Mon, 05 Nov 2007 16:41:45 +0000 http://ballastexistenz.autistics.org/?p=301#comment-15562 Recently our local children’s museum, The Discovery Museum in Charlottesville, VA, changed the interactive theme in their back room. This time it is about careers, so the place is set up like a little town with different shops and businesses, such as a doctor’s (complete with flashing red and blue police light and flourescent lights for viewing x-rays), a veterinarian’s with a flickering TV set (with actually a cool program featuring service dogs), and others. The little town has little street lights, which are child-sized so that the actual light is about even with my eyes. All the lights are those compact flourescent ones. My son loved the place and wanted to play there for about an hour, during which time I became unable to physically hold onto our two lightweight jackets and a small shopping bag with handles. When I tried to set the three things down on a chair, I missed the chair and they slid off. I couldn’t play with my son although he kept asking me to, as it seemed that what he said made little sense and that I couldn’t do it anyway. I bumped into a number of things and spent most of my time looking down at the ground in order to avoid the lights. When I left that section and got back to the other part of the museum I was already so sensitive that the regular flourescent lights there made me feel just as woozy. (Those bother me but usually not enough to make me really sick, just slightly sick). I think they change it every few months so I might have three more months of this. Luckily I have found another mom who is willing to watch the children in the back room if I need to leave.

The organ I play at church has a flourescent light that runs the length of the music rack, and is below the rack so it shines on the keys and the music at the same time. I tried just turning it off but it was too dark. I bought various colors of thin plastic frosted report covers and cut them and taped them to the light above and below and was able to make it so that I did not shut down while practicing. A combination of blue and golden yellowish orange frosted plastic seems to work. I tried about 5 colors in various combinations.

I have to direct my choir rehearsal under flourescent lights and I know it affects me (both the light and the buzzing), but I can’t tell how much. Perhaps if we ever have rehearsals outdoors or in non-flourescent light I will be able to tell the difference.

A mandatory flourescent light law would leave me crippled in quite a few situations.

]]>
By: Mountain Rose https://ballastexistenz.wordpress.com/2007/01/31/we-need-to-remove-this-access-barrier-before-it-gets-put-up-incandescent-lighting-ban-in-california/#comment-15561 Fri, 02 Nov 2007 20:19:57 +0000 http://ballastexistenz.autistics.org/?p=301#comment-15561 Back in Feb. following the original post I did call some state representatives in California and was told that they had no intention of enforcing mandatory florescent lighting and the proposal at least for this year had been shelved….That does not mean however that it might not be brought up again in another session so if anyone sees it hitting the light of day again please alert the rest of us. Proposals like this may be well-intentioned but are also extremely short-sighted. Not only are many people cognitively sensitive to florescents but many of the rest of us have reasons we need incandescent bulbs…In our rural area we used the heat from an incandescent bulb to keep one area of pipe from freezing during extreme cold so our water pump would still work. I appreciated Voyare’s restating the meaning of his/her first post. I think schools should be completely redesigned…and diversity celebrated and tools to fight bullying put into place and more attention paid to lighting/paint color/noise levels etc. There needs to be more
working at one’s own pace and students helping students in all subjects…More ways of learning need to be recognized…We all don’t process the same so we need more choices in education…

]]>